Introduction to Calculating Injection Mold Costs
Injection molding is one of the most common and cost-effective manufacturing processes for producing plastic parts at scale. FromLegos to iPhone cases, countless plastic products begin their journey inside an injection mold.
But how much does an injection mold actually cost? Determining the price is more complicated than you might think.
Unlike more straightforward fabrication techniques like CNC machining or 3D printing, injection molds require extensive engineering design, precision tooling, and machining processes to create. And those costs add up quickly.
This guide will give you a total rundown of what goes into injection mold costs. We’re talking part sizes, the kind of surface finish you want, how complex your mold is, and even where you are in the world.
Getting to grips with these important parts will make sure you’ve got the cash planned out for your upcoming injection molded piece. Plus, it means you won’t be caught off guard when you get pricing from those who make the molds.
So let’s dive in and unveil some of the mysteries around determininginjection mold cost!
Factors That Directly Influence Injection Mold Pricing
Many intricate details impact the costs of an injection mold build. Here are some of the most significant:
Mold Complexity
The more complex the mold, the more it will cost to design and manufacture. Design intricacy translates into additional hours for CAD work, CNC programming, machining, bench assembly, and testing.
Specific elements that increase complexity include:
- Part geometry: Intricate 3D contours, angles, drafts, and undercuts require more design time and precision tooling to create. Simple, shallow ribbing is easier to mold than deep pockets.
- Tolerances: Tighter tolerances demand more precise and expensive tooling and machining to hold dimensions. Looser tolerances allow faster, cheaper manufacturing.
- Side actions: Complex mechanisms to allow part ejection without pull add engineering time and expense. Simple molds with straight pulls are cheaper.
- Lifters: Components like pins, blades, and strippers that allow demolding of hollow or recessed areas add cost.
- Multi-cavity molds: Each cavity needs individual design of core/cavity components. A 4-cavity tool takes more time than a single-cavity.
- Hot runner systems: Integrated nozzle heating technology requires design, adds parts cost. A cold runner is simpler and cheaper.
An example illustrates the cost difference. A single-cavity mold for a basic plastic enclosure with simple geometry and looser tolerances will cost much less to design and build than a complex 4-cavity mold for a precision plastic gear with strict dimensional tolerances, moving side-actions, multiple lifters, and a hot runner system. The more complex mold has exponentially higher costs.
Material Selection
The type of plastic chosen for injection molding significantly impacts tooling costs in two ways:
1. Raw plastic resin pricing
Popular resins like ABS, PP, nylon, and PET are reasonably priced. More advanced resins like PEEK, ULTEM, and PPS cost multiple times more per pound. When you factor in the total volume of plastic over a production run, savings from cheaper resins adds up.
2. Mold materials
Standard steel molds suit most applications. But highly filled or abrasive plastics require hardened tool steels or exotic alloys to resist wear over hundreds of thousands of cycles. These alloys – like beryllium copper or aluminum bronze – have exponentially higher costs.
In general, opt for the most affordable plastic resin suitable for your application. Avoid highly abrasive fillers that necessitate expensive tooling alloys if possible.
LKM | AISI | JIS | W.Nr | ASSBA | HB | HRC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P20M | P20Modified | – | 1.2311 Modified | 260-350 | 26-38 | |
2311 | P20 | – | 1.2311 | 280-325 | 29-34 | |
738 | P20Modified | 1.2738 | 290-330 | 30-35 | ||
738H | – | – | – | 330-370 | 35-40 | |
738 MH ESR | P20Modified ESR | – | 1.2738 Modified ESR | 718H | 341-400 | 36-43 |
838HS | P20Modified | – | 1.2738 Modified | 330-380 | 35-42 | |
808 ESR | P21Modified ESR | – | – | 360-415 | 38-44 | |
2083 | 420 | SUS420J2 | 1.2083 | S136 | 240 (max) | |
2083H | – | – | – | – | 280-320 | 29-34 |
2083 ESR | 420Modified ESR | SUS420J2 Modified ESR | 1.2083 Modified ESR | S136 SUP | 250 (max) | |
2316 | – | – | 1.2316 | 250 (max) | ||
2316H | – | – | – | – | 265-340 | 27-36 |
Size of the Mold
An injection mold’s physical size directly correlates to material costs. Larger molds require substantially more tool steel or aluminum. They also consume more machining time during fabrication.
As some examples:
- A small mold fitting within a cube of 16∕ x 16∕ x 16∕ costs between $5,000-$15,000
- An medium-sized mold around 24∕ x 24∕ x 24∕ runs $15,000-$35,000
- Very large molds like those for automotive panels can exceed $100,000
For the best economy, minimize your part’s footprint as much as possible. Consolidate multiple components into a single tool when viable as well.
Tolerance Requirements
Dimensionally critical parts call for tighter mold machining tolerances. And improved precision leads to increased price tags.
General guidelines for tooling tolerance grades:
- Basic commercial grade: +/- 0.005∕
- Precision grade: +/- 0.002∕
- High-precision grade: +/- 0.001∕ (or tighter)
The precision grade provides the best balance for many applications. While +/- 0.001∕ tooling is possible, it often requires specialized machining processes that boost costs exponentially.
Only specify the tightest tolerances truly necessary for functionality. And work with your mold maker to determine optimal ways to achieve that precision cost-effectively.
Surface Finish Requirements
The desired finish and appearance for visible mold surfaces also affects cost. Injection molds are initially machined to have a smooth, basic mill finish.
Optional secondary polishing or texturizing includes:
Method | Process | Result |
---|---|---|
Glass Beading | Mechanically blasting glass beads onto metal surface | Matte to glossy polished finish depending on bead size |
Media Blasting | Blasting abrasive particles onto metal to abrade surface | Uniform fine etched texture |
Chrome Plating | Electroplating a thin layer of chrome onto base metal | Bright mirrored finish resistant to tarnishing |
Laser Etching | Focusing high-power laser to selectively vaporize material | Precise graphic patterns or designs etched into metal |
These extra finishes call for additional process steps by the mold maker, increasing cost. Simple mechanical polishing adds the least amount. Plating and precise laser etching can increase price substantially depending on the complexity.
Production Volume
The production volume expected over the mold’s lifetime determines suitable tooling materials and processes. Lower volume runs use lower cost options. Higher production needs greater durability necessitating pricier alloys and engineering choices.
- Prototyping: 1-10 parts, aluminum molds or 3D printed inserts
- Low volume: 10-10,000 parts, P20 tool steel, basic mold finish
- Medium volume: 10,000-100,000+ parts, hardened tool steel, improved finish
- High volume: 100,000+ parts, long lasting steels, premium engineering
In general, you get what you pay for with injection molds. Investing more up front for precision, durability, and automation pays off with higher production.
Lead Time for Manufacturing
The faster a shop can deliver your finished mold, the higher the price tag. Expedited lead times mean reshuffling personnel and equipment resources which increase cost.
Typical injection mold lead times run:
- Standard: 8-12 weeks
- Rush: 4-8 weeks
- Blazing: 2-4 weeks
Lead time also depends heavily on variables like mold size, complexity, material choices, and the shop’s current workload. Avoid unrealistic expectations when estimating delivery schedules.
Geographic Location for Manufacturing
Where in the world your tooling is sourced greatly impacts cost due to local labor rates and transportation logistics.
In broad terms:
- North America & Europe: Highest labor costs, premium quality
- China: Lower labor costs with wide quality spectrum
- Other Asian regions: Good balance of cost vs. capabilities
Domestic US mold shops provide responsive service and IP protections but at a premium price. Chinese shops offer significant savings but potentially lack specialized skills or use lower cost (lower quality) materials.
When sourcing globally, factor duty taxes, shipping expenses, and lead times as well. These quickly diminish apparent savings.
Secondary Factors That Influence Injection Mold Pricing
While less substantial than the major categories above, some secondary attributes nudge pricing up or down including:
Expected Lifespan and Durability
Mold purchasers expect their tooling investment to last for hundreds of thousands if not millions of cycles before requiring replacement. The production lifespan goal helps determine suitable materials and design principles.
More durable molds call for:
- Hardened tool steel construction
- Generous wall stock thicknesses
- Premium surface treatments
- Replaceable component blocks
These durability enhancements increase cost but pay dividends over years of continual production.
Maintenance and Upkeep Factors
Proactive mold maintenance keeps tools running optimally year after year. This requires periodic cleaning, inspection for wear/damage, and minor refurbishments.
Ongoing upkeep best practices include:
- Visual inspections for tool wear
- Polishing away nicks or debris buildup
- Replacing modular tooling components before failures occur
- Testing mold protection systems like hot runner isolation
While not incorporated into initial pricing, maintenance is crucial for maximizing mold longevity and performance.
Design Principles for Manufacturing
The best injection molds balance quality, longevity, and affordability. Mold makers utilize Design for Manufacturing (DFM) principles to optimize this balance from the start.
Intelligent DFM assesses proposed parts for potential stumbling blocks like:
- Overly complex geometries
- Extreme aspect ratios
- Excessive draft angles
- Non-uniform wall stock thickness
Then suggests modifications to improve moldability while minimizing unnecessary tooling expenses.
Getting DFM input early when planning plastic parts makes the biggest impact on controlling cost. Refining details later in development has less influence.
Conclusion and Next Steps
This guide covers the extensive list of variables that determine injection mold pricing. While intricate, the information provides realistic wisdom when budgeting for an upcoming project.
No single factor tells the entire story. But evaluating how each element applies to a specific component or product provides an accurate picture. From there, you can make selections to optimize for capability, quality, and affordability.
Some key takeaways:
- Mold complexity directly relates to higher cost
- Balance desired finishes vs. budgets
- Specify only necessary tolerances
- Match production volumes to capability
- Seek qualified global mold making partners
Ready to get started with a free instant injection mold quote? Submit your 3D model here and our engineers will provide precise pricing tailored to your project within 24 hours.